I think she doesn't realize the amount of gay she puts into the books until after they're published and people ask these questions.
I really think this is true. I think that she desperately doesn't want them to hook up. I think that she thinks that she's building up a great story of epic friendship here, and that she is surprised/annoyed when people mention how gay they are for each other.
BUT SHE ONLY HAS HERSELF TO BLAME! Not just for creating the sexual tension in the first place, but by making blood lust/sex such a major part of Ivy and Rachel's interactions together. We have no basis for their friendship without the sexual tension between them, because they were like mounting each other 100 pages into the first book.
It's like, Jesus fucking Christ woman, if you didn't want to have to deal with the gay then you shouldn't have made it THE MOST CONSISTENT ISSUE IN YOUR BOOK SERIES!
I love your epic collection of rage pictures and animations
lol, I'm glad. They help me deal with the rage. It's really cathartic using them actually :D
no subject
I really think this is true. I think that she desperately doesn't want them to hook up. I think that she thinks that she's building up a great story of epic friendship here, and that she is surprised/annoyed when people mention how gay they are for each other.
BUT SHE ONLY HAS HERSELF TO BLAME! Not just for creating the sexual tension in the first place, but by making blood lust/sex such a major part of Ivy and Rachel's interactions together. We have no basis for their friendship without the sexual tension between them, because they were like mounting each other 100 pages into the first book.
It's like, Jesus fucking Christ woman, if you didn't want to have to deal with the gay then you shouldn't have made it THE MOST CONSISTENT ISSUE IN YOUR BOOK SERIES!
I love your epic collection of rage pictures and animations
lol, I'm glad. They help me deal with the rage. It's really cathartic using them actually :D