Entry tags:
The Hollows: I did it! I finished WWBC (and I only hate my life a little)
Okay, so at this point I think we all know what my feelings were about the first half of this book:

I'll admit it, the second half of the book is far less hateful than the first half ... of course, that is kind of like saying that I'd rather someone piss on my face than shit on it, but moving on ...
1. Rachel made a smart decision (for a while) and ...







I was shocked. This book should have come with a warning. I had to sit down for a while. I breathed into a paper bag for a good twenty-minutes. My mind was turned upside down. I looked at a picture of former U.S. President George W. Bush and thought he looked cute. I think I cried a little. My mother got a call that made no sense, and I think she's now very worried about me (the jokes on her if she tries to get the voices to stop talking to me! Because they're telling me to buy her Tim Horton's gift cards and flowers!).
Rachel said it was too risky to go to the party with Edden, and then she kept on refusing to go to the party with Edden, and then when she hung up, she had still not agreed to go to the party with Edden.

Of course, later on that back-down and sense that Rachel displayed, disappeared back off into the fairy wonderland it came from and Rachel once again started acting like a complete jackass and decided that it would be a good idea to fight banshee's in her bare-feet on New Year's.

You only get half for that shit, Cock Block!
Also was it just me or was Edden being a major douche in this scene (and then the rest of the book)? I mean, putting Glenn back out in the field? Wow. Douche.
2. Ivy was in a good mood (and Rachel didn't manage to ruin it in like three seconds flat!) and being all sexy and shit and cracking jokes: Witness:
Will there be news vans and screaming? ... Count me in.
My mother always said I came from heaven.
You're a fun date. People look at you.

But, but, but, but ... THEN, Cock Block has to make Ivy all "Oh I feel so good, I look like a frickin' supermodel, and my roommate can't stop checking me out .... I HATE MY LIFE!" and, and, and, and ... THEN, Cock Block makes Ivy and Glenn dating, and Cock Block ...

This pairing actually doesn't inspire any hate in me, it just confuddles me something fierce! I mean, what? Why? Where? Huh? WHAT?
I think quizical baby expresses it best:

(No, I don't know this child. But this is what happens when you post children of your babies online. Crazy people put them in picture rants! Really, you should have seen this coming.)
Like, I said. I don't really hate this pairing. Ivy was really funny after gettin' her flirt on with Glenn, and I love me some funny Ivy so whatever I guess. Since we've got approximately eleventy billion more books to go, I can deal with Ravy getting closer while Ivy gets to be funny and happy for a while while she is dating Glenn (although, why he brings out the funny I have no idea). Ivy's (completely unnecessary) love interest is about a billijillion times better than fucking Pierce so, whatever I guess. My spirit is a little crushed. I just can't really care about these two, beyond hoping for more funny!ivy.
Speaking of fucking!Pierce ... FUCKING PIERCE! I HATE THIS MUTHAFUCKIN' PIECE OF RACHEL-CANDY! Really ...

3. This Rachel/Pierce fuckwittery cannot end soon enough. I dont' care what Cock Block is theoretically trying to do with him. I don't care aboutEvery teenage girls Rachel Morgan's epic crush on Zac Efron Pierce, I don't care that she has been comparing everyone to Pierce and finding them lacking, or about how Rachel needs to get over her idealized version of love in order to find a flawed but real kind of love that can last.
I don't care because Cock Block has made Pierce an annoying little bastard! I'm not a New York Times best selling author, but I'm gonna go ahead and say that PIERCE IS SHITTY WRITING. SHITTY! (don't worry, I'm not going to post a picture for this one!) His dialogue is embarrassingly bad. It's like reading an eigth-graders play about Princess Gwendoliphina of Narwolk (and the Knight that loves her!) It is painful to read, and sometimes doesn't make sense. The way he speaks is SO over the top. I've read Jane Austen. I liked that shit. That bitch is good. This is NOT Jane Austen, Cock Block. Jane Austen is rolling over in her grave ... THIS IS WHAT YOU'VE CAUSED...

Just ... *sigh* Please just make him go away. Quickly. Usually it takes me a couple books to hate a character this much, I hated Pierce after his second word of dialogue. Just ... *sigh*
Cock Block, you have broken me like you are Hugo Weaving and I am Natalie Portman in the smash Hollywood hit V for Vendetta... the only verdict is vengeance; a vendetta, held as a votive, not in vain, for the value and veracity of such...
4. The whole Kisten's killer thing was ...

I think
trancer21 covered the 'meh' of this well here, so I'm not gonna bother because the meh of it all is paralyzing me with not caring at the moment.
I didn't hate Rachel torching the place or whatever, I just felt it was a bit ... I don't know ..

It was like an epic tantrum. I was far more moved by Ivy's quiet misery and rage. Rachel's response was a little too ...

...for me to handle.
I did like the hugging and the aura sharing, and the "I'll never let go" of that scene. But after a while, I was like "Goddam!" you know. It's like, Rachel, listen to Ivy ...

.
And now for thatsuper awesome short section of this post ...
Okay, here goes ... THINGS I LIKED ABOUT WHITE WITCH, BLACK CURSE
1. The cover was very nice. I liked the picture.
2. As far as I can tell, all of the words were spelled correctly.

3. There WERE some nice Ravy moments ...
- I found it hilarious that a sign of Rachel's increasing love for Ivy is that she can smell her real good, but it is a pretty nice little factoid.
- I liked that Rachel showed real concern for Ivy after Mia stripped her aura from her. She was like worried about her and shit, which is a nice change from her Book 5 "Ivy must save herself" bullfuckery.
- The airport scene with the PSA Lesbians was nice. I'm glad that Rachel has learned that gays are people too ...

...but the only reason she and Ivy can't be happy like that couple is becauseRachel Cock Block, keeps cock-blocking like it's going out of style. But yeah, it's fine Cock Block, I see that you've provided a whole paragraph of positive lesbian images (before turning the one actual lesbian in the book into a Jennifer Jason Leigh in Single White Female with bonus attempted voyeur rape action). I won't call you a homophobe. I honestly don't think you are (I'm being serious, I don't think she is! Don't yell at me!). You're just a cock-blocker ... who is afraid people might come after you ... and they might!

- I liked Rachel checking Ivy out hardcore after Ivy's night of binge drinking in the back of Cormel's Escalade (sounds kinda like vampire prom!)
- I liked Ivy and Rachel's pseudo-date, and Rachel being all, "Yeah, I'm with this hot bitch ...

- And of course, I liked the casual aura sharing. Ivy is such a pimp. She's all, "Oh, hey Rachel. I didn't see you there. How are you? I like your hair, did you cut it? Looks good. We should totally catch up. No, no seriously, we should totally catch up. So, ah ... wanna share an aura? We don't have to. I'm just saying ... I'm here, you're here, black curses are giving me a tan, why not?
So, yeah. Other than Rachel being all ...
+
= 
It was a really good scene.
4. It ended.
So, in conclusionI'm pretty sure there's tons of stuff I forgot to mention, that's how I feel.
*yawns* *goes to take that nap*
*Warning: This post is image heavy*
Also, apropo of nothing ... is anyone watching Kings on NBC? I'm loving it so far. About 40% of that is because Susanna Thompson is rocks my world. Another 30% is because Thomasina rocks my socks. And the other 30% is for all of the other assorted awesomeness that makes up this show. *wants people with whom to ramble about Kings*

I'll admit it, the second half of the book is far less hateful than the first half ... of course, that is kind of like saying that I'd rather someone piss on my face than shit on it, but moving on ...
1. Rachel made a smart decision (for a while) and ...






I was shocked. This book should have come with a warning. I had to sit down for a while. I breathed into a paper bag for a good twenty-minutes. My mind was turned upside down. I looked at a picture of former U.S. President George W. Bush and thought he looked cute. I think I cried a little. My mother got a call that made no sense, and I think she's now very worried about me (the jokes on her if she tries to get the voices to stop talking to me! Because they're telling me to buy her Tim Horton's gift cards and flowers!).
Rachel said it was too risky to go to the party with Edden, and then she kept on refusing to go to the party with Edden, and then when she hung up, she had still not agreed to go to the party with Edden.

Of course, later on that back-down and sense that Rachel displayed, disappeared back off into the fairy wonderland it came from and Rachel once again started acting like a complete jackass and decided that it would be a good idea to fight banshee's in her bare-feet on New Year's.

You only get half for that shit, Cock Block!
Also was it just me or was Edden being a major douche in this scene (and then the rest of the book)? I mean, putting Glenn back out in the field? Wow. Douche.
2. Ivy was in a good mood (and Rachel didn't manage to ruin it in like three seconds flat!) and being all sexy and shit and cracking jokes: Witness:
Will there be news vans and screaming? ... Count me in.
My mother always said I came from heaven.
You're a fun date. People look at you.

But, but, but, but ... THEN, Cock Block has to make Ivy all "Oh I feel so good, I look like a frickin' supermodel, and my roommate can't stop checking me out .... I HATE MY LIFE!" and, and, and, and ... THEN, Cock Block makes Ivy and Glenn dating, and Cock Block ...

This pairing actually doesn't inspire any hate in me, it just confuddles me something fierce! I mean, what? Why? Where? Huh? WHAT?
I think quizical baby expresses it best:

(No, I don't know this child. But this is what happens when you post children of your babies online. Crazy people put them in picture rants! Really, you should have seen this coming.)
Like, I said. I don't really hate this pairing. Ivy was really funny after gettin' her flirt on with Glenn, and I love me some funny Ivy so whatever I guess. Since we've got approximately eleventy billion more books to go, I can deal with Ravy getting closer while Ivy gets to be funny and happy for a while while she is dating Glenn (although, why he brings out the funny I have no idea). Ivy's (completely unnecessary) love interest is about a billijillion times better than fucking Pierce so, whatever I guess. My spirit is a little crushed. I just can't really care about these two, beyond hoping for more funny!ivy.
Speaking of fucking!Pierce ... FUCKING PIERCE! I HATE THIS MUTHAFUCKIN' PIECE OF RACHEL-CANDY! Really ...

3. This Rachel/Pierce fuckwittery cannot end soon enough. I dont' care what Cock Block is theoretically trying to do with him. I don't care about
I don't care because Cock Block has made Pierce an annoying little bastard! I'm not a New York Times best selling author, but I'm gonna go ahead and say that PIERCE IS SHITTY WRITING. SHITTY! (don't worry, I'm not going to post a picture for this one!) His dialogue is embarrassingly bad. It's like reading an eigth-graders play about Princess Gwendoliphina of Narwolk (and the Knight that loves her!) It is painful to read, and sometimes doesn't make sense. The way he speaks is SO over the top. I've read Jane Austen. I liked that shit. That bitch is good. This is NOT Jane Austen, Cock Block. Jane Austen is rolling over in her grave ... THIS IS WHAT YOU'VE CAUSED...

Just ... *sigh* Please just make him go away. Quickly. Usually it takes me a couple books to hate a character this much, I hated Pierce after his second word of dialogue. Just ... *sigh*
Cock Block, you have broken me like you are Hugo Weaving and I am Natalie Portman in the smash Hollywood hit V for Vendetta... the only verdict is vengeance; a vendetta, held as a votive, not in vain, for the value and veracity of such...
4. The whole Kisten's killer thing was ...

I think
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
I didn't hate Rachel torching the place or whatever, I just felt it was a bit ... I don't know ..

It was like an epic tantrum. I was far more moved by Ivy's quiet misery and rage. Rachel's response was a little too ...

...for me to handle.
I did like the hugging and the aura sharing, and the "I'll never let go" of that scene. But after a while, I was like "Goddam!" you know. It's like, Rachel, listen to Ivy ...

.
And now for that
Okay, here goes ... THINGS I LIKED ABOUT WHITE WITCH, BLACK CURSE
1. The cover was very nice. I liked the picture.
2. As far as I can tell, all of the words were spelled correctly.

3. There WERE some nice Ravy moments ...
- I found it hilarious that a sign of Rachel's increasing love for Ivy is that she can smell her real good, but it is a pretty nice little factoid.
- I liked that Rachel showed real concern for Ivy after Mia stripped her aura from her. She was like worried about her and shit, which is a nice change from her Book 5 "Ivy must save herself" bullfuckery.
- The airport scene with the PSA Lesbians was nice. I'm glad that Rachel has learned that gays are people too ...

...but the only reason she and Ivy can't be happy like that couple is because
- I liked Rachel checking Ivy out hardcore after Ivy's night of binge drinking in the back of Cormel's Escalade (sounds kinda like vampire prom!)
- I liked Ivy and Rachel's pseudo-date, and Rachel being all, "Yeah, I'm with this hot bitch ...
- And of course, I liked the casual aura sharing. Ivy is such a pimp. She's all, "Oh, hey Rachel. I didn't see you there. How are you? I like your hair, did you cut it? Looks good. We should totally catch up. No, no seriously, we should totally catch up. So, ah ... wanna share an aura? We don't have to. I'm just saying ... I'm here, you're here, black curses are giving me a tan, why not?
So, yeah. Other than Rachel being all ...



It was a really good scene.
4. It ended.
So, in conclusion
*yawns* *goes to take that nap*
*Warning: This post is image heavy*
Also, apropo of nothing ... is anyone watching Kings on NBC? I'm loving it so far. About 40% of that is because Susanna Thompson is rocks my world. Another 30% is because Thomasina rocks my socks. And the other 30% is for all of the other assorted awesomeness that makes up this show. *wants people with whom to ramble about Kings*
no subject
.....and now I'll go back to being grumpy about my coach.
no subject
no subject
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
Like, I said. I don't really hate this pairing (Ivy/Glenn).
I don't hate it either. It's just one of those *looks at CBMcG* Am I *really* supposed to believe that this is NOT going to end badly? Ivy's a vampire. Ivy's a vampire who can't separate her blood lust from her sexual desires. Glenn's a human, which is like a walking, talking Happy Meal to vampires. Oh yea, this has 'happy ending' written ALL over it! Plus, I'm also not happy that CBMcG alluded to Ivy's attraction to Glenn was because he was injured.
As far as I can tell, all of the words were spelled correctly.
Lol, I love that in scraping the bottom of the barrel in an attempt to find something positive to say, good grammar is one of the few things left to grasp upon!
ETA: I'd also like to thank you for putting, in pictures, what I failed to explain in like 12 paragraphs, ie, this -
I didn't hate Rachel torching the place or whatever, I just felt it was a bit ... I don't know .. It was like an epic tantrum.
Had finding Kisten's killer and the torching happened at the end of book 5 or the beginning of book 6 (which it *really* fucking should have), it would have made more sense. Rachel's pain and the rage would have been more immediate, closer to the surface. Instead, this takes place two books and 6 months later. I'm not saying there should be a moratorium for one's grief but in that time, Rachel non-dated Marshall (along with totally awesome witch-sex in the belfry), met the previously unheard of 'true love of her life' and moved heaven and earth to steal him from Al. So, her grief and rage feels.. disingenuous. Honestly, it's the type of reaction I'd expect from Rachel if Jenks, Ivy, or Alice were killed, not a glorified fuck buddy who occasionally cooked for her.
no subject
Well, since Glenn will admit to liking Ivy back, and probably freely admits to wanting to have sex with her, Ivy could probably shackle her hunger around him. I have a hard time believing that Glenn would want to get bitten though. It seems out of character for him what with him taking baby steps into Interland life. And if he doesn't want to get bitten, Cock Block has just written Ivy into another kinda-relationship like she has with Rachel where her S.O kinda hates her for what she is.
And can't humans be turned by the vampire virus? I can't even remember how this happens in the Cock Block McGee-verse, but you'd think that would be a worry. Rachel can't be turned, and Ravy are still Emo Emosteins over everything, but Ivy has like no worries whatsoever about being with Glenn? What the fuck ever, Cock Block.
I'm also not happy that CBMcG alluded to Ivy's attraction to Glenn was because he was injured.
LOL! I'm imagining that that is Rachel's effed up reasoning, trying to deal with her subconscious jealously. Because WTF! Glenn better hope Ivy stops stopping by the hospital. That place must be like a fucking swingers party to her! Honest, Cock Block. That's just dumb. But like this whole storyline it kind of amuses me, but mostly I don't care.
Lol, I love that in scraping the bottom of the barrel in an attempt to find something positive to say, good grammar is one of the few things left to grasp upon!
Yeah, it's like I was seconds away from adding, "The chapter headings had nice font". By rage has died a little, but I'm not finding much to love in the book. Even the Ravy moments are kind of bittersweet, because of the constant cock-blocking, and the knowledge that this is a never-ending series hanging over me.
Had finding Kisten's killer and the torching happened at the end of book 5 or the beginning of book 6 (which it *really* fucking should have), it would have made more sense. Rachel's pain and the rage would have been more immediate, closer to the surface.
This. When you have Rachel talking about how she thought that she could've maybe made a life with Marshall, and having dinner dates with her family and Marshall (which never happened with Kisten), and then wavering between Pierce and Marshall for half the book, and then outright saying that Kisten didn't measure up to memories of Pierce at the end, her reaction seems sooooo over the top. Even her motivation was dumb. She doesn't want people to see his death as a political killing? WHAT? Who the fuck even gives a shit about Kisten's death other than her and Ivy? Are the papers really following this shit with bated breath? I think not. You mean you don't want that it was a political killing to be written in some file that I'll be forgotten five seconds after it's put in a drawer? Honestly, willfully using black magic, and smutting up her precious soul for THAT was just dumb.
Honestly, it's the type of reaction I'd expect from Rachel if Jenks, Ivy, or Alice were killed, not a glorified fuck buddy who occasionally cooked for her.
I know, right! *sigh* I did like that in this book, Rachel seemed to realize that Ivy losing her soul would be kind of a bad thing, and was all like, "uh, I'm gonna actually try now!" about it. That thought she had that she couldn't imagine living without Ivy in her life was nice.
Seriously, Cock Block, you best be going somewhere with all of this!
no subject
Yep. See Denon, Rachel's father, etc...
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2009-03-31 17:13 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
Me too! Pictures express what I'm feeling so well :D
I do watch Kings, but haven't caught up on last night's episode yet.
It's good. Rose is UH-MAZ-ING in it. And I was totally shipping Rose/Thomasina throughout the episode. There was a nice little moment where Rose straightened Thomasina's jacket, and then where Thomasina was fastening a braclet for Rose, and I was immediately like "THEY ARE SECRETLY DOING IT", and I fell even more in love with everything.
BTW, if you watch Chuck, Tricia Helfer is going to be in it.
I don't watch Chuck, but I'll probably watch this episode. I saw a commerical for it, and Tricia was making my pants feel really happy. She is too hot. I find her so smokin' good looking when she's not playing Six (or at least the bleached blonde Six, Natalie, Gina and assorted other Six's were smokin' as well).
no subject
no subject
no subject
Yeah, the characterization of the characters is very important. Lately i've been feeling like the characters are watered down. (Pierce is 100% water, 0% substance)
Even the main characters like Ivy and Rachel are in danger of stagnating if they don't grow somehow sometime soon.
no subject
I might have gone a little crazy, lol
Lately i've been feeling like the characters are watered down. (Pierce is 100% water, 0% substance) Even the main characters like Ivy and Rachel are in danger of stagnating if they don't grow somehow sometime soon.
This is what is bothering me so much. The book extensions are killing the series for me. There needs to be a natural progression for characters, and then they need to be put to rest, and author and audience need to move on. There is no natural progression, only unnatural cock-blocking with these two right now. We've seen Ivy and Rachel's problems, at these point we've seen multiple variations of the same problem, they need to move forward. That they aren't is capitalism and cash-cowism at it's worse.
no subject
If it had ended after a page of him appearing, it wouldn't have been soon enough. I mean... seriously? What's this bullshit with Pierce being a "Rachely" guy? Okay, so maybe she's been comparing just about everyone she's ever dated up to a long lost memory of a guy who was SO IMPORTANT THAT SHE DIDN'T REMEMBER HIM UNTIL BOOK SEVEN and none of them are up to standard.
Say we actually followed this new storyline and believed it made sense, hypothetically speaking of course, Cock Block probably doesn't even realize that she totally wrote Ivy as the one person in Rachel's life who has definitely made it past the wtf!Pierce-standard. She's head over heels for Rachel and she's so dangerous that nearly every interaction with her gets Rachel's adrenaline running. Their relationship doesn't even need crazy adventure into the ever-after, banshee-fighting, and werewolves.
Usually it takes me a couple books to hate a character this much, I hated Pierce after his second word of dialogue.
He is breaking the series for me. He might just be the last straw placed on this book!ship before it sinks. Unless she gets rid of him. Soon.
no subject
Truth: You're speaking it!
comparing just about everyone she's ever dated up to a long lost memory of a guy who was SO IMPORTANT THAT SHE DIDN'T REMEMBER HIM UNTIL BOOK SEVEN
Well, apparently he's mentioned in Kim's anthology short stories, but it's still fuckery. Most of the audience hasn't read those, so Pierce literally came out of nowhere. And I know for sure that I'm not reading the short story where he showed up EVER because I HATE him.
Cock Block probably doesn't even realize that she totally wrote Ivy as the one person in Rachel's life who has definitely made it past the wtf!Pierce-standard. She's head over heels for Rachel and she's so dangerous that nearly every interaction with her gets Rachel's adrenaline running. Their relationship doesn't even need crazy adventure into the ever-after, banshee-fighting, and werewolves.
You've summed up why Rachel and Ivy work together so well here. Ivy is flawed, but she is the ULTIMATE Rachel-candy. Ivy is the one who is perfect for Rachel. Rachel moans never being able to find a man who can deal with her life, but she has already found a fucking gorgeous, selfless, dreamy woman who IS dealing with her life, and is an important part of it - not some side dish of little relevance.
The fact that Cock Block expects us (and Rachel) to keep ignoring this is ridiculous. And if we're not supposed to be ignoring it, if we're supposed to see how perfect they are THEN STOP DICKING ABOUT! Get them together, tie up the lose ends in the over-all plot and END THE FUCKING SERIES!
He is breaking the series for me. He might just be the last straw placed on this book!ship before it sinks. Unless she gets rid of him. Soon.
Yeah. If he's major part of the next book I probably won't read it. I'll try and get people to tell me which pages I need to read for Ravy (ex. 34-45, 90-112, etc) and then not bother with the rest. I really, really hate him. I disliked Marshall, but I LOATH Pierce. I can't handle more of him.
(no subject)
no subject
Dude, this was the scene that pissed me off! Not at Rachel mind you, though her obliviousness is EPIC, but rather at KH. Do not give us random happy lesbian couple, and have Rachel comparing their relationship to hers with Ivy and then say that Rachel/Ivy will not happen. If she really does not want Rachel/Ivy to happen. Fine. Whatever. Hate it, but you know, her books, her perogative. Just don't freaking pander and lead on your freaking audience.
And that's my rant, apparently....
no subject
THIS! This is why everyone thinks things are pointing to Ravy together at the end. Cock Block Ravy hints are constant, never ending and GROWING. If you're a Trench shipper or a Ral shipper (EW!) then whatever, you can dig to find hints and feel free too. But the Ravy hints are right there, they are part of the plot. That's not subtext, Cock Block, it's text and if you don't follow through it makes you look like a bitch ass punk.
Just don't freaking pander and lead on your freaking audience.
This. Since Rachel just realized that gays are people too, Cock Block needs to remember that and stop fucking with her audience.
pfgoihjwlke and KINGS!
To my main point:
I LOVE KINGS. It's epic. And not epic fail (at least not yet). It's making me super happy with every episode, and the quality of each episode is not deteriorating which is monumental. So yes. Also, the women look good and aren't two dimensional. And there's the crazy (sorta gay) prince - you always need one of those you know. Big Love has one. This book I'm reading - The Yiddish Policeman's Union - has one. You just need a gay prince. I'm modifying my definition of prince to include first son to a prominent person, but you get it.
In conclusion, KINGS FTW (and you rock)!
Re: pfgoihjwlke and KINGS!
I wouldn't be ranting like this if I didn't like the series (at one point, and to some degree now even though that like is being tainted more and more rapidly). I say enjoy it (cause it's really really good at points) and then join the rest of us in Irritation Alley.
It's epic. And not epic fail (at least not yet).
:D
Also, the women look good and aren't two dimensional.
I know! Amazing. Wonderfully amazing. I feel bad for the Michelle actress because she's getting overshadowed acting wise by every other woman on the show, but at least the character is intelligent (and David is equally underwhelming in the acting department, so they fit well together).
And there's the crazy (sorta gay) prince - you always need one of those you know.
I really like Jack. I felt for him so much this episode, but I also wanted to slap him silly. I think Sebastian Stan is doing a fantastic job. Honestly, I didn't know he could really act. And Jack is totally falling for David, and is going to get SO burned.
no subject
(Now you've half-made me think that I should actually read this book!)
no subject
Now you've half-made me think that I should actually read this book
There is some nice Ravy stuff, and happy!Ivy was really enjoyable, but there is a lot of crap too. What I took to in the second half was scanning anything that didn't have Ivy in it. I got to skip a bunch of pages that way, I could still keep up with the plot since Rachel recaps everything a gazillion times, and it lessened the amount of annoying things I had to read. I'd recommend doing that, if you want to read the Ravy.
no subject
And Pierce, just thank you for your awesome summary of everything that is wrong with Gordian Nathaniel Pierce! I would so love to see Rachel deal with her shunning, to learn to live by her own moral code and not have Pierce ride in and save her. Of course, I'm also the person that writes HP fics with Harry learning to use technicallly dark magic but retaining light morals, so you know. And Rachel and Ivy's semidate was beyond fantastic!
no subject
This. Skimmer wasn't perfect before, but she had redeemable characters, namely her love for Ivy, and the fact that she was actually willing to fight for her.
She loved Ivy, damn it, and even after getting in prison for her, she realized that Ivy was always going to care for Rachel who, in her oppinion, doesn't give a shit about Ivy.
This has got to be especially hard to deal with. If Rachel and Ivy were happy as clams and sexin' like bunnies, Skimmer would probably have been like "Well, fuuuuuuck" and backed off. But the Rachel/Ivy situation is kind of fucked up right now, with some sweet moments that eventually lead to things being fucked up again.
Skimmer found so much beauty in the fact that Ivy was a vampire, in the mixing of blood and sex, and Rachel seemed to want Ivy to fix herself to fit Rachel's definitions of morals. I don't know if that made a bit of sense, but it was like: Don't mix sex and blood because I'm not comfortable with it; find some way to shackle your hunger because of what I want because it's the only way it's going to work.
THIS! OMG THIS! It's bugging me so much. Piscary fucked Ivy up, yes. And she DOES have issues to work through. But trying to change who she is genetically is ridiculous. Her reaction to feeding after having her aura stripped shows that drinking blood SHOULD be a part of her life. She needs it to really feel healthy. RACHEL IS THE ONE SCREWING HER UP EVEN MORE by making her think that there's something wrong for her need for blood. She's a freaking vampire, there isn't! Rachel needs to let Ivy bite her and feed off of her in the same way every other freaking vampire in the world feeds, and Rachel needs to shut the fuck up.
I get Ivy hating being a vampire because of losing her soul. But she even said that she likes the rest of being a vampire, and if she was with someone who didn't make her feel like a dirty whore for feeding, she'd probably be fine with that part too (and yes, I think Rachel's judgey McJudgerson routine when Ivy was with Skimmer, made Ivy feel badly about the relationship)
*off to continue fic where Ivy and Skimmer talk this crap out; will stop rant now*
I cannot wait for this!
I would so love to see Rachel deal with her shunning, to learn to live by her own moral code and not have Pierce ride in and save her.
This would be awesome. It's never going to happen in the Cock Block McGee-verse, but it should!
no subject
MAKE HOT PASSIONATE LOVE TO ME NOW, YOU WONDERFUL RANT-IST. <--Rantist is not a word. Fail.
no subject