Thank you, baby Jesus!!!
Aug. 21st, 2009 01:44 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
fembuckMila Kunis and Natalie Portman ...
Our buddy Carson Reeves over at Scriptshadow has written a script review of "Black Swan," the supernatural ballet movie that Darren Aronofsky will hopefully be directing this fall with Natalie Portman and Mila Kunis in the lead roles.
The premise is simple: A ballerina competes against a rival dancer who may or may not be another version of herself.
But Carson, perhaps wisely, leads his review with this titillating little nugget which will probably have the Internet all a Twitter momentarily.
Can I just tell you why none of my review matters? Can I just tell you why my review is absolutely pointless? Because in this movie, Natalie Portman and Mila Kunis have sex. Yeah. You read that right. And not just nice sweet innocent sex either. We're talking ecstasy-induced hungry aggressive angry sex. Yeah so...this movie is already on the must-see list of 2010. But how good is it? Does the story that surrounds the sex disappoint or excel?
So yeah, there's that. But what about the actual film, a project, he notes, Aronofsky originally tried to set up at Universal in 2007, but the studio turned around on. However, recently, thanks to the success of "The Wrestler," Portman evidently "twirled onto the project a couple of months ago and everything's been full steam ahead since."
Source / Source
I think I speak for us all when I say, YIPEE!!!!
Our buddy Carson Reeves over at Scriptshadow has written a script review of "Black Swan," the supernatural ballet movie that Darren Aronofsky will hopefully be directing this fall with Natalie Portman and Mila Kunis in the lead roles.
The premise is simple: A ballerina competes against a rival dancer who may or may not be another version of herself.
But Carson, perhaps wisely, leads his review with this titillating little nugget which will probably have the Internet all a Twitter momentarily.
Can I just tell you why none of my review matters? Can I just tell you why my review is absolutely pointless? Because in this movie, Natalie Portman and Mila Kunis have sex. Yeah. You read that right. And not just nice sweet innocent sex either. We're talking ecstasy-induced hungry aggressive angry sex. Yeah so...this movie is already on the must-see list of 2010. But how good is it? Does the story that surrounds the sex disappoint or excel?
So yeah, there's that. But what about the actual film, a project, he notes, Aronofsky originally tried to set up at Universal in 2007, but the studio turned around on. However, recently, thanks to the success of "The Wrestler," Portman evidently "twirled onto the project a couple of months ago and everything's been full steam ahead since."
Source / Source
I think I speak for us all when I say, YIPEE!!!!
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2009-08-21 06:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-08-21 06:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-08-21 06:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-08-21 06:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-08-21 06:26 pm (UTC)Also damn, I missed your interview! :( I totally thought that it was Wednesday and I couldn't be online but it was yesterday and I missed it for being a dumbass lol Can't wait to hear it though!
no subject
Date: 2009-08-21 06:51 pm (UTC)We do need another feel good lesbian romantic comedy that is also a GOOD movie. I Can't Think Straight was also a good one, but I'm ready for another dammit!
This movie at least will fill my hot lesbian action demand! I love supernatural thrillers so this movie has basically everything I need. I don't love that the scene will be "ecstasy-induced", but I'm hoping that there will be lots of hate!flirting before that so you know they would have done it anyway!
Also damn, I missed your interview! :( I totally thought that it was Wednesday and I couldn't be online but it was yesterday and I missed it for being a dumbass lol Can't wait to hear it though!
No worries, you can it from here (http://www.blogtalkradio.com/allaine) (just scroll down until you see 'Multi-Fandom Author Interview #2 - Fembuck')
no subject
Date: 2009-08-21 06:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-08-21 07:10 pm (UTC)Is going to be me when the movie comes out!
no subject
Date: 2009-08-21 07:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-08-21 06:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-08-21 07:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-08-21 07:08 pm (UTC)And LOL, my GIF collection just keeps growing thanks to you ^^ Where do you find them?
no subject
Date: 2009-08-21 07:14 pm (UTC)Where do you find them?
Mostly I just grab them from threads at ohnotheydidn't (http://community.livejournal.com/ohnotheydidnt/) and ontd_twatlight (http://community.livejournal.com/ontd_twatlight/)
People posts all kinds of gems in threads on those two sites. My .gif collection gets better every day!
no subject
Date: 2009-08-21 09:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-08-21 07:08 pm (UTC)I'm listening to your interview right now, laughing about your cock blocky talk. It is funny to hear that actually being spoken.
So .. when did the Rachel won't be bound theory start popping up?
no subject
Date: 2009-08-21 07:18 pm (UTC)Ok ... where do you find these GIFs? Srsly. I've been meaning to ask that for a long time.
Mostly I just grab them from threads at ohnotheydidn't (http://community.livejournal.com/ohnotheydidnt/) and ontd_twatlight (http://community.livejournal.com/ontd_twatlight/). Pretty much all of my .gifs have come from threads at those two sites.
I'm listening to your interview right now, laughing about your cock blocky talk. It is funny to hear that actually being spoken.
lol! I had to control myself a lot during that interview not to go into full on Hollows-Rant mode ;) I didn't want to scare people off of the series if they hadn't started reading yet. And honestly, as much as the books DO frustrate me, I also really like them.
So .. when did the Rachel won't be bound theory start popping up?
I think it came out of a question someone asked Kim in her drama box maybe a month ago. She basically shrugged her shoulders and said she didn't know in the response, but I think the person who asked was dead on and that Rachel's demon blood is going to end up making her immune to being bound. In fact, hearing that makes me kind of excited that we might see a blood balance between Rachel and Ivy in the next book or the book after, and that the blood balance will then naturally lead to a more physical relationship.
no subject
Date: 2009-08-21 07:24 pm (UTC)I don't remember the details much at the moment, but did the books mention that demons can't be bound way back? If so, then cock block knew it all and set us up for ranting, because she plans everything deliberately.
no subject
Date: 2009-08-21 07:40 pm (UTC)I just didn't want to scare potential new fans off ... or sound like a crazy person, lol.
I don't remember the details much at the moment, but did the books mention that demons can't be bound way back? If so, then cock block knew it all and set us up for ranting, because she plans everything deliberately.
I think that it was mentioned in the last book, WWBC.
But yeah, I totally think that Cock Block has a really good idea where everything is going. Things always change as you write, but I think she's definitely building towards a Rachel/Ivy ending, and has slowly been paving the way for that since the first book.
She just doesn't want to confirm anything.
I'm honestly beginning to think this woman is some kind of evil genius, lol. As much as I'm dreading Rachel/Pierce and Ivy/Glenn in the next book, I really want to know what incredibly gay things she has in store for Rachel and Ivy and their relationship.
no subject
Date: 2009-08-21 07:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-08-21 07:50 pm (UTC)lol, I had already completely forgotten that tidbit, and was "wait, what?" Just shows how interesting their relationship is.
I really want to know what incredibly gay things she has in store for Rachel and Ivy and their relationship.
That sounds awesome. Incredibly gay things for Rachel and Ivy. Thumbs up *grin*
I wonder if Kim will go the route of some fanfic authors, where there will be so much gay that it will be absolutely hilarious, but Rachel will still think she's completely, 100%, straight.
no subject
Date: 2009-08-21 08:11 pm (UTC)Oh, I know. Ivy/Glenn is so stupid. Nobody thinks that's going to work. Ivy is too obviously in love with Rachel for another romantic interest to stand a chance. As long as Ivy is in that church, living and working with Rachel, and being utterly in love with her, there's no point in putting a romantic interest on the scene for her because it's clearly useless.
I wonder if Kim will go the route of some fanfic authors, where there will be so much gay that it will be absolutely hilarious, but Rachel will still think she's completely, 100%, straight.
You know what, I feel like she's already reached this level.
I just can't take Rachel's other romantic interests seriously, and Ivy/Glenn is just mind-blowingly cock-blocky. I feel if you looked cock-block up in the dictionary, a picture of Ivy/Glenn should be there.
It's just that at this point, Rachel has already proven herself to be really, really, really gay for Ivy. I mean there is really nothing ambiguous about it, and so her denials of an attraction and her unwillingness to at least TRY a relationship are so ridiculous that you have to laugh or cry about it.
Lots of other shit has been going on in their lives for a long time now, but with book 7 gone, I really feel like we're at a point in the series where Rachel needs to just deal with that shit. She clearly has feelings for Ivy, and now it's just really, really annoying that she's still in denial. Why? She's not homophobic, her friends aren't, her mother isn't, Ivy is head over heels, self-sacrificingly in love with her ... so why does she still deny it? I don't get why she does anymore. In the beginning she was uncertain and confused, but now Rachel's just being a stubborn douche about the whole thing.
Honestly, it really bugs me that Rachel would give a ghost trapped in the body of one of the most annoying people ever who she's know for like a month a chance, before she would give Ivy a chance.
This Rachel-candy, purposefully making bad decisions, turning a blind eye, thing that Rachel has going on is really a form of character assassination. Rachel's a character who I liked a lot in the beginning, but the more that she pulls these shenanigans the more I dislike her.
She's that friend that you have that is constantly in emotional crisis and pulling you into their messy lives because they thrive on drama and constantly need their life to be in crisis. Friends like that are annoying as hell, and Rachel is becoming annoying as hell too.
no subject
Date: 2009-08-21 08:32 pm (UTC)And she would completely believe that, and it would be true.
But she would still be completely lost on why she never really loved anyone, until Ivy came along and can't shake the feeling of wanting to kiss her all the damn time.
I think that's Rachel. I wonder though why she doesn't even give it a shot. All it takes is a little bit of courage.
no subject
Date: 2009-08-22 12:22 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-08-22 04:53 am (UTC)But yeah, you get me on the topic of the Hollows and you will get a rant (though admittedly these days they are much less bitter and rage-filled than they were a few months ago).
no subject
Date: 2009-08-21 07:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-08-21 07:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-08-21 07:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-08-21 08:17 pm (UTC)Also, it will be nice to see Mila playing 'kind of gay' again! And Natalie doing it for the first time!
no subject
Date: 2009-08-21 09:27 pm (UTC)totally unrelated but whenever I see the NP picture above I think about cutting my hair that short and style it like that. unfortunately I am blond, and I am rather sure (positive actually) that I would not look good. maybe I should stuck to the shirt. dude, that was really off topic and rambling. I am tired and then I jump a lot.
no subject
Date: 2009-08-22 04:47 am (UTC)Very sweet.
totally unrelated but whenever I see the NP picture above I think about cutting my hair that short and style it like that.
LOL! I was just thinking about how cool her hair looks when I saw the picture as well. I know I wouldn't be able to pull anything like that off either though. Also, that cool puffy thing is does would probably be really though to maintain throughout the day.
no subject
Date: 2009-08-22 02:50 pm (UTC)By the way.
Date: 2009-08-21 09:38 pm (UTC)It felt fit for you.
Re: By the way.
Date: 2009-08-22 04:48 am (UTC)I am SRS BSNS *does happy dance*
P.S. Your cat looks a lot like my friends cat, so I feel like I know him/her already!
no subject
Date: 2009-08-22 02:13 am (UTC)Natalie is kind of meh for me just in general but I fucking adore the pants off of Meg Griffin Kunis. Cannot wait. And as shallow as it is, this post improved a pretty sucky day, so score one more for the healing power of potential on-screen girl secks. lol
no subject
Date: 2009-08-22 04:51 am (UTC)I know. It's so cruel to announce this so far in advance and just leave the world in limbo, waiting for this awesomeness to be revealed!
Natalie is kind of meh for me just in general but I fucking adore the pants off of Meg Griffin Kunis.
Natalie is stunning, but it is in a kind of clinical way for me. I think she's beautiful, but she's not really sexy to be. That being said, there's no way that Natalie and Mila sexing angry won't be hot. I really hope that Mila's character is all tough and badass like in Max Payne or After Sex, cause she does that well. Also, her being all badass in After Sex, and talking dirty after getting head from Zoe Saldana was hot as hell.
And as shallow as it is, this post improved a pretty sucky day, so score one more for the healing power of potential on-screen girl secks. lol
I'm sorry your day was sucky, bb. *sad face* I am happy that future girl secks was able to cheer you up a little bit though :)
no subject
Date: 2009-08-22 04:34 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-08-22 04:52 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-08-22 05:21 am (UTC)My life. It's one step closer to being complete.
no subject
Date: 2009-08-22 06:01 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-08-22 05:39 am (UTC)SWEET LORD
Why haven't I heard of this movie until just now?
no subject
Date: 2009-08-22 06:02 am (UTC)I know!
I feel like this is something that I should have known about since it's inception. Though, maybe it's better I haven't known about it longer, because the wait for it is already going to be too long!
no subject
Date: 2009-08-22 02:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-08-24 07:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-08-24 12:42 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-08-24 07:38 pm (UTC)This!
and you, dear Janine, for the news.
I'm glad that I could be part of this beautiful announcement. Honestly, it was my pleasure :D
no subject
Date: 2009-09-05 07:13 am (UTC)Duuuuuuuuuuudee