![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)

My character’s going to be a good 60 percent bigger in the second film.

Second of all, what exactly does '60 percent bigger' mean? Does it mean 60% bigger than in the last film, where ... let's see 5 min. x .60 (=3, so 5x3 = 15) so does that mean she's going to get like 15 minutues on screen. Does does she mean that she's in like 60% of film, in which case 90 min. - god, please don't make it longer than that - x .60 = 54, in which case she'd be on screen for 54 min.? I'm torn on what I want this to mean. On one hand I really love Alice and Ashley Greene and want to see her on screen, but on the other hand if Alice is only gonna be in it for like 15 minutes I could probably avoid seeing it in theatres. Oh, woe.
(Full Interview - with cute pic of Ashley as Alice)
Also, LJ folks here's the link to my dreamwidth journal, which
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
no subject
Date: 2009-05-08 09:16 pm (UTC)It's counting on them not to screw it up that worries me. I'm really worried that they'll shaft the friendship stuff, in favor of more love triangle shenanigans. The fear is probably not justified since Alice/Bella have a LOT of interaction in New Moon, but I'm still upset that we didn't get the hotel scene from Twilight in the first one, and have semi-convinced myself that they will screw me out of Alice again.
I think this movie will be better because they got a new director. So I have higher hopes for it.
I hope so, but I actually didn't hate Hardwick's directing. I think if Hardwick had been able to just do her thing that the movie would have been better, but SMeyer had her grubby little paws all over the movie, and I think that she's just as involved in this one. Hopefully, SMeyer will be too busy trying to prove she's not a plagarizer in court to meddle with the film too much.