![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
fembuckOn pg. 362 of WWBC, Rachel is mixing a spell that goes like this:
"Wine to give life, dust to give substance, ivy to bind, and holly to be sure nothing bad came in on the souls of the dead."
The ingredients of ivy and holly, when this book has two major characters named after the ingredients just really captured my attention, and now I can't get the idea out of my head that somehow Holly will be a key part of saving Ivy's soul.
Wine to give life, wine could equal blood here which goes give life and is linked to aura sharing. Dust I'm not so sure about, but it makes me think of Jenks. Ivy to bind, of course makes me think of Ivy and then with the wine/blood thing, it makes me think of binding process. Maybe love is a major component and Rachel will have to be bound to Ivy to save her soul, only maybe it will bind them equally together so that there's no icky imbalance of power. And then of course, Holly's ability (that whole being able to transfer an aura back into a person thing) will able to make the aura stick in some way. I mean, a whole thing was even made about how Remus is able to hold Holly because of this gift, and all book Rachel is bitching about not being able to hold/touch Ivy.
I would actually love it if this were the case, because it would mean that Ivy kind of selflessly giving her wish up to someone else so that they could find love, comes back in a beautiful karmic circle and allows her to keep her soul which will allow her to finally love and be loved in return.
It's probably a throw away line that means nothing, especially since it's part of a spell to get Mr. Darcy back (and it's only Book 7), but I finally had a thought about this book that didn't involve rage, so I thought I would share it!
P.S. The pictures for my other two Hollows rants should be up and working again by tomorrow or Tuesday!
Also, because I just remember this thought I'd had earlier ... is there any reason, Ivy didn't just wish to be able to keep her soul after her first death? I mean, I know that it wouldn't have helped vampires everywhere, but since the idea of losing her soul tortures her so much, why not just wish to keep it. Maybe this was addressed, but I don't remember.
"Wine to give life, dust to give substance, ivy to bind, and holly to be sure nothing bad came in on the souls of the dead."
The ingredients of ivy and holly, when this book has two major characters named after the ingredients just really captured my attention, and now I can't get the idea out of my head that somehow Holly will be a key part of saving Ivy's soul.
Wine to give life, wine could equal blood here which goes give life and is linked to aura sharing. Dust I'm not so sure about, but it makes me think of Jenks. Ivy to bind, of course makes me think of Ivy and then with the wine/blood thing, it makes me think of binding process. Maybe love is a major component and Rachel will have to be bound to Ivy to save her soul, only maybe it will bind them equally together so that there's no icky imbalance of power. And then of course, Holly's ability (that whole being able to transfer an aura back into a person thing) will able to make the aura stick in some way. I mean, a whole thing was even made about how Remus is able to hold Holly because of this gift, and all book Rachel is bitching about not being able to hold/touch Ivy.
I would actually love it if this were the case, because it would mean that Ivy kind of selflessly giving her wish up to someone else so that they could find love, comes back in a beautiful karmic circle and allows her to keep her soul which will allow her to finally love and be loved in return.
It's probably a throw away line that means nothing, especially since it's part of a spell to get Mr. Darcy back (and it's only Book 7), but I finally had a thought about this book that didn't involve rage, so I thought I would share it!
P.S. The pictures for my other two Hollows rants should be up and working again by tomorrow or Tuesday!
Also, because I just remember this thought I'd had earlier ... is there any reason, Ivy didn't just wish to be able to keep her soul after her first death? I mean, I know that it wouldn't have helped vampires everywhere, but since the idea of losing her soul tortures her so much, why not just wish to keep it. Maybe this was addressed, but I don't remember.
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2009-03-29 08:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-29 08:34 pm (UTC)Oh yeah, I remember something about that in DWW now. I'd imagine that WOULD be a difficult one.
I already completely forgot that part because I seem to automatically block everything else out that isn't Ravy or serious plot action.
lol, I'm like that too! I only remembered this because I literally read it, and then came here and posted because I was so happy to have a thought about WWBC that wasn't drenched in disdain. And it's Ravy implications (possibly) are the only reason I even care, lol